[Mathijs Kok (Aerosoft)]

Liveries, part 1.

Attached thumbnail(s)

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

[Mathijs Kok (Aerosoft)]

Liveries, part 2

Attached thumbnail(s)

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

[regamuffin]

Thank you for your fast reply much appricated, hopefully there's nothng else wrong and we will all be able to fly her soon.

[SF22]

Looking good!

Are this all the liveries that will be included in the original release? Have to say I think it's a bit strange chooses Simcheck has made with them. I seriously wonder how large the flightsim market is in the Middle and Far East. Especially in Iran and Pakistan! Okay most probably they are about the only ones who nowadays operate those but it would have been great to have a Finnair livery! Repainters! Hopefully they'll make it after release though (haven't got an answer on that yet, but one can always hope!

http://www.airliners...db60d51bd270de4

[Nick C]

I'm sure there will be a wealth of repaints by talented 'skinners' to cover those repaints not included or added later by SimCheck.

Mathijs may like to clarify the following statement found at the foot of this SimCheck web-page:

http://simchecksoftw...hp?page=preview

Quote

Note: The SimCheck package will include a generic paint job, no real-life paint jobs will be included, they will be offered as freeware downloads via the website.

[Steffen Rabenau]

Sorry if this is asked before, could´nt find something what helps me...

How deep are the INS simulated, there stands just "on basis of CIVA INS". This (sorry) sounds suspect to me, that the functionality isn´t complete on this systems.

Thanks in advance !


Steffen Rabenau

[awf]

Steffen Rabenau, on 04 February 2010 - 10:24 PM, said:

Sorry if this is asked before, could´nt find something what helps me...

How deep are the INS simulated, there stands just "on basis of CIVA INS". This (sorry) sounds suspect to me, that the functionality isn´t complete on this systems.

Thanks in advance !


Steffen Rabenau

http://simchecksoftw....php?topic=35.0

André

[Cyberstudio]

Hi!, just a note: the DHL Yellow nose and the PIA nose aren't well aligned. Maybe that should be fixed in a future service pack or something

[matt oberdorfer]

is there anyway we could see a wingview image? and how much will this baby cost?

thanks

[signmanbob]

SamZ, on 02 February 2010 - 05:14 AM, said:

Looks great! Hope we can have her this week

It's looking really good. I will also be ready for her this week if it is released. I like the Boeings too, but I'm glad to see some more Airbus being made. There was a shortage of them and a huge shortage of the older A300 Airbus.
This looks like it will be a lot of fun to fly. I really can't wait now.

[CX 747-400]

Cyberstudio, on 04 February 2010 - 06:45 PM, said:

Hi!, just a note: the DHL Yellow nose and the PIA nose aren't well aligned. Maybe that should be fixed in a future service pack or something

Same thing with the Continental. Plus the Orange seem wrong.

[SF22]

CX 747-400, on 05 February 2010 - 08:29 AM, said:

Same thing with the Continental. Plus the Orange seem wrong.

Looks like the Lufthansa, Eastern, Continental, Pakistan International, Singapre Airlines and red DHL suffer the same problem on the front door in a smaller scale! Or maybe it's just an optic illusion!

[montreal]

SF22, on 05 February 2010 - 06:35 AM, said:

Looks like the Lufthansa, Eastern, Continental, Pakistan International, Singapre Airlines and red DHL suffer the same problem on the front door in a smaller scale! Or maybe it's just an optic illusion!

Not sure about the optical illusion but I can see where you are coming from.

When I first saw the exterior screenshots, the engines and wings look realistic but the paint and texturing on the fuselage almost looks like it comes from FS 98. Can't tell if they are just poor screenshot renditions or I am becoming too spoiled with all the McPhat repaints out there.

This is more a question on my part as I don't want Aerosoft and the developers to think I am slamming a new product that hasn't even been released.

Everything else on this plane looks fantastic and I know I will be buying it.

Karl

[Nick C]

This is just my opinion, but I'm guessing that the focus of the developer was on the plane, rather than the repaints. My reasons for that are due to the comments I mentioned in my previous post. If this plane sells well, and I'm sure it will, I can't imagine that it will be long before those that like wielding brushes start to churn out the colours.

[ABird]

When its the release ? Few Days ?

Lukas

[Sar71]

Nick C, on 06 February 2010 - 12:17 AM, said:

This is just my opinion, but I'm guessing that the focus of the developer was on the plane, rather than the repaints.

Yes, maybe...but so many mapping errors (on all doors, the cargo door and the nose) are not what I would expect from a €40 addon

On the Pakistan International livery one can also see a mismatch between the green color of the fuselage and the nose. These kind of mistakes should have been discovered in a serious beta test

Greetings
Tim

[SF22]

I haven't seen these questions but is time compression supported and is it possible to configure the aircraft that the sim will pause at a certain waypoint or before TOD?

[Gaura Mohana]

to me the windows look out of line. is it supposed to be like that?

[pao]

montreal, on 06 February 2010 - 12:03 AM, said:

Not sure about the optical illusion but I can see where you are coming from.

When I first saw the exterior screenshots, the engines and wings look realistic but the paint and texturing on the fuselage almost looks like it comes from FS 98. Can't tell if they are just poor screenshot renditions or I am becoming too spoiled with all the McPhat repaints out there.

This is more a question on my part as I don't want Aerosoft and the developers to think I am slamming a new product that hasn't even been released.

Everything else on this plane looks fantastic and I know I will be buying it.

Karl

Totally agree with you... even the focus is not on the external, this is supposed to be much easier to design than the aircrafts systems themselves... so the developers could have make an effort. On my side I won't get this plane because beside very realistic systems, I like looking at planes and this one doesn't look good... I'll get the Airbus X though.... of course !

[Just Fly]

I don't think it's the right place to do so many comments (I mean negative comments) about the external models. Of course, don't misunderstand me, I'm not saying everything's perfect because some of your comments are right. But on a preview topic about a product that is going to be released, the sellers/developpers want to attract people, not people to say "It's not as good as I've imagined it".

Then some comments made me smiling: when somebody said it looks like a FS98 plane, he/she probably missed the fact that the A300 is a plane that was created in 1974, so it's normal it looks a bit "old". About all other comments, I think:

• First, it's a beta (a very late one, but still a beta). So the release version will, maybe, look different (for those who think it's not already great).
• Then, it's impossible to release a really perfect add-on, without even one error, that's why some weeks after the initial release there's often a patch. Just wait for it, perhaps these paintings will be corrected!

Anyway, when a real Aircraft Industry, such as Airbus or Boeing, makes a plane, the most important is that this plane flies. Don't forget it, because Sim Companies, I suppose, have the same target, but on a Simulator. It's much more complicated to do 100% fuctionnal gauges than a repaint. I completly agree with Nick here, but as he said, it's only my opinion...

Hope my post is not too direct.